Which Assumptions Underlie Adjudicators’ Conclusions that Refugee Claimants are Lying? A Canadian case study SSHRC 2021-24.
Assistant Professor
A major focus of Hilary Evans Cameron’s work has been the process of judging a refugee claimant’s credibility. Her research brings insights from the social sciences, particularly cognitive psychology, to bear on this central aspect of refugee status decision-making. She has also explored other legal barriers that prevent people without status from accessing the courts and from winning their cases on judicial review. Her interest in clinical legal pedagogy arose from her experience teaching at the legal clinic of the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Law, where she developed a method for involving law students in stopping deportations.
No posts found
Areas of Expertise: Refugee law, administrative law, memory, risk perception, lie detection, logic and legal reasoning, clinical legal education
Contributions
Hilary Evans Cameron & Sean Rehaag LFO 2019.The Meet Gary team is made up of refugee lawyers and refugee law researchers. We …
Artificial Intelligence for a Reduction of False Denials in Refugee Claims Hilary Evans Cameron & Avi Goldfarb & Leah Morris, “Artificial Intelligence …
Ryerson and UofT Professors Are Researching How AI Could Change Refugee Law Minh Truong, Ryerson and UofT Professors Are Researching How AI …